ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of three-dimensional (3D) laparos-copic radical resection of rectal cancer with left colic artery preservation and natural orfice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES).Methods:The retrospective and descriptive study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 186 patients with rectal cancer who were admitted to Henan Provincial People's Hospital from December 2018 to December 2019 were colleted. There were 120 males and 66 females, aged from 30 to 81 years, with a median age of 59 years. Patients underwent 3D laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer. Observation indicators: (1) surgical and postoperative situations; (2) follow-up. Follow-up using outpatient examination or telephone interview was conducted to detect survival of patients and tumor recurrence up to January 2021. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD, and measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M(range). Count data were described as absolute numbers and percentages. Result:(1) Surgical situations: 186 patients with rectal cancer under-went 3D laparoscopic radical resection and postoperative with left colic artery preservation and NOSES. The operation time was (123±24)minutes, volume of intraoperative blood loss was (30±20)mL, the numer of lymph nodes dissected was 15±7. The time to postoperative first flatus, time to semiliquid food intake, time to postoperative out-of-bed activities were (2.3±0.7)days, (4.1±1.4)days, (2.9±1.0)days, respectively. The incidence of postoperative complications was 8.06%(15/186). The duration of postoperative hospital stay of 186 patients was (6.6±1.9)days and the treatment cost was (3.8±1.1) ten thousand yuan. Results of postoperative pathological examination showed 54 cases of low differentiated adenocarcinoma, 97 cases of moderate differentiated adenocarcinoma, 19 cases of high differentiated adenocarcinoma and 16 cases of mucinous adenocarcinoma. (2) Follow-up: 186 patients with rectal cancer were followed up for 13 to 24 months, with a median follow-up time of 13 months. During the follow-up, 18 patients had tumor recurrence or metastasis including 6 patients of death, 168 cases recovered well.Conclusion:3D laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer with left colic artery preservation and NOSES is safe and feasible.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate PCOA + NOSES with 3D laparoscopy in the left colon cancer radical resection.Methods In this study 64 patients underwent PCOA + NOSES with 3D laparoscopic radical operation of the left colon cancer in He'nan Provincial People's Hospital from June 2016 to June 2019.Result The operation time was(146 ±53)min,time for anastomosis of PCOA was(30.3 ±2.5)min,intraoperative blood loss was (51 ±26)ml,the bowel function recovered in (2.1 ± 1.3)d,the time to semiliquid diet was (4.1 ± 1.4) d,time to being up and about was (1.3 ±0.6) d,the mean postoperative hospital stay was (5.4 ± 1.4) d,the number of lymph nodes dissection was (22 ± 9.5),the inhospital cost was (4.1 ± 1.2) ten thousand yuan.Complications developed in 4 patients (6％),one of intestinal obstruction,one of anastomotic leakage,one patient had ascites and infection,one suffred from pulmonary infection.Conclusion The PCOA + NOSES with 3D laparoscope in the left colon cancer radical resection was safe and feasible.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To evaluate the short-term and oncologic outcomes of single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery (SILS+ 1) for sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer.@*Methods@#The clinic data of 46 patients with sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer underwent SILS+ 1 at Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University from September 2013 to September 2014 were retrospectively reviewed (SILS+ 1 group). After generating 1∶1 ration propensity scores given the covariates of age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, surgeons, tumor location, the distance of tumor from anal, tumor diameter, and pathologic TNM stage, 46 patients with sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer underwent conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) in the same time were matched as CLS group. The baseline characteristics and short-term outcomes were compared using t test, χ2 test or Wilcoxon signed ranks test. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Log-rank tests demonstrated the distribution of disease free survival.@*Results@#The two study groups were well balanced with respect to the baseline characteristics of the propensity score derivation model. As compared to the CLS group, patients in SILS+ 1 group had a smaller incision ((6.9±1.1) cm vs. (8.4±1.2) cm, t=6.502, P=0.000), less estimated blood loss (20(11) ml vs. 50(30) ml, Z=2.414, P=0.016), shorter intracorporeal operating time ((67.0±25.8) minutes vs. (75.5±27.7) minutes, t=2.062, P=0.042) and significantly faster recovery course including shorter time to first ambulation ((46.7±20.3) hours vs. (78.6±28.0) hours, t=6.255, P=0.000), shorter time to first oral diet ((64.7±28.8) hours vs. (77.1±30.0) hours, t=2.026, P=0.047), shorter time of postoperative hospital stay ((7.8±2.2) days vs. (6.5±2.2) days, t=2.680, P=0.009), and lower postoperative visual analogue scale scores (F=4.721, P=0.032). No significant difference was observed in total operating time, postoperative morbidity, first time to flatus and defecation, analgesic use, number of retrieved lymph nodes and resection margin. During the median follow-up period of 33 months (ranging from 7 to 39 months) , there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of 3-year disease-free survival (SILS+ 1: 91.3%, CLS: 93.4%, P=1.000). The recurrence rates of SILS+ 1 group and CLS groups were 8.7% (4/46) and 6.5% (3/46), respectively.@*Conclusion@#For experienced CLS surgeons, the SILS+ 1 for sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer would be easiness, safe and efficient alternative.
ABSTRACT
For further maximizing the minimally invasive benefits for colorectal cancer patients, laparoscopic surgeons have been dedicating to improve the surgery through single-port (SILES) or natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), which is supported by amount of single-port devices and flexible laparoscopic instruments.Many small sample studies of single institution have suggested that SILES for colorectal cancer has similar oncological outcomes with conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS), could improve the cosmetic results, and is more minimally invasive than CLS. However, evidences of advantages for SILES are limited, because of there has been only 4 published studies of prospective randomized clinical trial so far. Due to the technical difficulties and long learning curves, SILES and NOTES are relatively hard to be widely promoted. Thus, a balance between minimally invasive pursuit and laparoscopic technical challenge should be sought. In this way, modified SILES and reduced-port laparoscopic surgery have emerged in recent years, which might be minimally invasive solutions with lower technical demanding for laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgeries. Adding a port as the surgeon′s dominant operation channel improved the collisions or overlapping of instruments with movement to reduce the technical difficulties. SILS+ 1 is safe and feasible, would be supported by more and more evidences.